No complaints heard; resolving ticket.
Patch was committed to trunk 01 Dec in r23331.
The patch attached changes x86 - stack and ppc - register in the
relevant files. I have tested it successfully in a 'stack' environment
(Linux x86) but don't have a 'register' environment in which to test it.
Can someone please help out here? I would then apply it to trunk.
kid51
Index:
On Fri Nov 09 23:31:56 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It in no way refers to architecture actually. It refers to the calling
convention on an architecture(dependent upon implementation). The x86
method is by pushing arguments onto the stack, and the ppc method is in
registers. On amd64,
On Nov 10, 2007, at 7:42 AM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Fri Nov 09 23:31:56 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It in no way refers to architecture actually. It refers to the
calling
convention on an architecture(dependent upon implementation). The x86
method is by pushing arguments onto
On Friday 09 November 2007 23:28:52 Joshua Isom wrote:
It in no way refers to architecture actually. It refers to the calling
convention on an architecture(dependent upon implementation). The x86
method is by pushing arguments onto the stack, and the ppc method is in
registers. On amd64,
On Sat Nov 10 11:55:07 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about stack and register, or are there better labels? If it's
confusing now, it will probably be confusing in the future, especially
for
everyone who doesn't know it's the platform ABI.
So if we were to change:
x86 - stack
On Saturday 10 November 2007 15:48:08 James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Sat Nov 10 11:55:07 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about stack and register, or are there better labels? If it's
confusing now, it will probably be confusing in the future, especially
for everyone who doesn't know
How about stack and register, or are there better labels? If it's
confusing now, it will probably be confusing in the future, especially for
everyone who doesn't know it's the platform ABI.
That sounds like the essential distinction to me.
While I was researching the topic, I came across
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #47313]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47313
The description for Parrot configuration step class auto::va_ptr
states that its
On Nov 9, 2007, at 8:08 PM, James Keenan (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #47313]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47313
The description for
11 matches
Mail list logo
