On Fri Feb 22 20:18:03 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > The test passed at 25900.
> >
>
> and it passed at 25950. I'll have to pick up on this tomorrow.
And it passed at 25973.
On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:18 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
The test passed at 25900.
and it passed at 25950. I'll have to pick up on this tomorrow.
OK, I know what I did to break it. I'm going to see if I can get it
to fail on OS X and then fix it the real way, rather than the way
ch
>
> The test passed at 25900.
>
and it passed at 25950. I'll have to pick up on this tomorrow.
On Fri Feb 22 19:38:42 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008 19:33:12 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
>
> Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
>
I should have spoken more precisely. The revision at wh
On Friday 22 February 2008 19:41:28 Andy Lester wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2008, at 9:38 PM, chromatic wrote:
> >> Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
> > Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
> What is the fix we're talking about?
My patch in r50920, which you revert
On Feb 22, 2008, at 9:38 PM, chromatic wrote:
Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
What is the fix we're talking about?
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Friday 22 February 2008 19:33:12 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
-- c
Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro...21/33
# Failed test (t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro.t at line 298)
# ''
# doesn't match '/End of file reached/
# '
# './parrot -D40 --gc-debug
"/Users/jimk/work/parrot/t/compilers/imcc/sy
On Sat Feb 16 20:46:51 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does this patch fix it?
>
> -- c
>
Yes. c++, errr, chromatic++.
Patch applied to trunk in r25793. t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro.t now
passes on Darwin. 'make coretest' passes completely on Darwin. 'make
test' passes on Linux.
Thank y
On Saturday 16 February 2008 15:26:41 Will Coleda wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2008 2:28 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can either of you post a backtrace for the segfault?
> See attached.
Does this patch fix it?
-- c
=== compilers/imcc/imcc.l
On Feb 16, 2008 2:28 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 16 February 2008 10:46:14 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > Binary searching. Fails in r25613, Feb 10, so problem started before then.
>
> Can either of you post a backtrace for the segfault?
>
> -- c
>
See attached.
--
Continuing binary search. I got a pass at r25454, Feb 03. So we're
looking somewhere between 25455 and 25613.
On Saturday 16 February 2008 10:46:14 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Binary searching. Fails in r25613, Feb 10, so problem started before then.
Can either of you post a backtrace for the segfault?
-- c
Binary searching. Fails in r25613, Feb 10, so problem started before then.
I've been seeing this on trunk on osx intel for some days now.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Feb 16, 2008, at 10:37 AM, James Keenan (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #50920]
# in the subject line of all future correspon
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #50920]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50920 >
Running 'make test' on ppc-darwin with gcc-3.3 this morning, I got
failures in three t
16 matches
Mail list logo
