Re: [perl #51860] Failures in t/manifest/*.t in a release

2008-03-19 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 16:07:49 James Keenan via RT wrote: > On Wed Mar 19 13:33:00 2008, bernhard wrote: > > The '.svn' dirs are no in the unpacked dist. So it is assumed that 'svk' > > is used. But I don't have 'svn' installed. > Have we found any way of saying, "Unless you're working in a

[perl #51860] Failures in t/manifest/*.t in a release

2008-03-19 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Wed Mar 19 13:33:00 2008, bernhard wrote: > > The '.svn' dirs are no in the unpacked dist. So it is assumed that 'svk' > is used. But I don't have 'svn' installed. > Have we found any way of saying, "Unless you're working in a sandbox checked out of the Parrot repository with one of our (u

Re: [perl #51860] Failures in t/manifest/*.t in a release

2008-03-19 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
James Keenan via RT schrieb: On Tue Mar 18 12:58:08 2008, bernhard wrote: When preparing the Parrot 0.6.0 release I encountered in an unpacked distfile for prove -v t/manifest/*.t the attached errors. For the release I simply commented out the dubious tests. Barney: If I read

[perl #51860] Failures in t/manifest/*.t in a release

2008-03-18 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Tue Mar 18 12:58:08 2008, bernhard wrote: > When preparing the Parrot 0.6.0 release I encountered in an unpacked > distfile for >prove -v t/manifest/*.t > the attached errors. > > For the release I simply commented out the dubious tests. > > Barney: If I read parrotsketch correctly, th

[perl #51860] Failures in t/manifest/*.t in a release

2008-03-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer # Please include the string: [perl #51860] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51860 > When preparing the Parrot 0.6.0 release I encountered in an unpacked distfile