chromatic wrote:
I prefer this patch. It fixes the problem closer to its source. Does it work
for you?
Yes, that works for me. However the fix does not get exercised without
the new test case (or something similar) added in the original patch.
Thanks!
Tom
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:42 AM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer this patch. It fixes the problem closer to its source. Does it
work
for you?
Works for me, but I wonder if the set_string_native function still
needs the fix, or an assertion about a forbidden combination of
# New Ticket Created by Tom Erdevig
# Please include the string: [perl #53714]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53714
Parrot segfaults running this:
.sub _ :main
null S0
loadlib P0, S0
.end
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:52 AM, via RT Tom Erdevig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parrot segfaults running this:
.sub _ :main
null S0
loadlib P0, S0
.end
The segfault is caused by src/dynext.c:Parrot_load_lib setting
its local lib_name variable to NULL and then passing it along
to
On Monday 05 May 2008 13:50:51 NotFound wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:52 AM, via RT Tom Erdevig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parrot segfaults running this:
.sub _ :main
null S0
loadlib P0, S0
.end
The segfault is caused by src/dynext.c:Parrot_load_lib setting
its local