Will Coleda (via RT) wrote: [...]
I would expect one of the following things to happen here, either: - an error is generated when test2 is parsed because there is no name for the named parameter, or - test2's blarg .param should default to being named 'blarg', so both calls should work identically. Even more confusing, this code:
Yes, we need better error checking and better error reporting in named argument handling. We need a general invocation refactor, but can do it in small stages.
Let's go with defaulting to the same name as the .param on the bare :named. Allison
