[perl #63146] [TODO] Implement (*) in the LHS of 'my' declarations

2009-02-25 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Wed Feb 11 01:21:29 2009, masak wrote: > Larry (>): > > Actually, that would have to be (*@) in a my, since a my takes a > > signature. You can only use (*) in an ordinary list assignment: > > > > (*) = 5; > > ($a,$b,$c,*) = @values; > > Ok, since the latter two work already, I'm resc

[perl #63146] [TODO] Implement (*@) in the LHS of 'my' declarations

2009-02-12 Thread Carl Mäsak via RT
Larry (>): > Actually, that would have to be (*@) in a my, since a my takes a > signature. You can only use (*) in an ordinary list assignment: > > (*) = 5; > ($a,$b,$c,*) = @values; Ok, since the latter two work already, I'm rescuing this bug ticket by re-naming it "[TODO] Implement (*@

Re: [perl #63146] [TODO] Implement (*) in the LHS of 'my' declarations

2009-02-10 Thread Larry Wall
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:14:35PM -0800, Carl Mäsak wrote: : # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" : # Please include the string: [perl #63146] : # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. : # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63146 > : : : my (*) = 5 sh

[perl #63146] [TODO] Implement (*) in the LHS of 'my' declarations

2009-02-10 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #63146] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63146 > my (*) = 5 should work though iirc rakudo: my (*) = 5; rakudo 577566: OUTPUT«Could n