[perl #69010] [BUG] &break outside of topicalizer block should be a compile-time error in Rakudo

2012-01-11 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Sat Aug 07 13:30:25 2010, masak wrote: > On Tue Aug 03 09:18:48 2010, bbkr wrote: > > in * release > > > > [18:16] rakudo: break > > [18:16] rakudo efe72c: OUTPUT«Could not find sub &break␤ > in > > main program body at line 22:/tmp/3991IK9D0k␤» > > > > [18:18] std: break > > [18:18] std 318

[perl #69010] [BUG] &break outside of topicalizer block should be a compile-time error in Rakudo

2010-08-07 Thread Carl Mäsak via RT
On Tue Aug 03 09:18:48 2010, bbkr wrote: > in * release > > [18:16] rakudo: break > [18:16] rakudo efe72c: OUTPUT«Could not find sub &break␤ in > main program body at line 22:/tmp/3991IK9D0k␤» > > [18:18] std: break > [18:18] std 31897: > OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Undeclared rout

[perl #69010] [BUG] &break outside of topicalizer block should be a compile-time error in Rakudo

2009-09-05 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #69010] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=69010 > the latest spec change says 'break' outside of a topicalizer block is a compile-time er