Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
>
> > So then the lexically scoped operator:+ wouldn't be able to achieve
> > the goal of my suggested implicit numerification warning... the goal
> > being the ability to ensure that there are no implicit num
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> So then the lexically scoped operator:+ wouldn't be able to achieve
> the goal of my suggested implicit numerification warning... the goal
> being the ability to ensure that there are no implicit numerifications,
> that all numeri
Larry Wall wrote:
> Aaron Sherman writes:
> : On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:30:00AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> : >
> : > Glenn wrote:
> : >
> : >> > Have I missed anything?
> : >>
> : >> Perhaps you've missed one thing.
> : >>
> : >>[snip]
> : >>
> : >> Perl 6 coul
Aaron Sherman writes:
: On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:30:00AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
: >
: > Glenn wrote:
: >
: >> > Have I missed anything?
: >>
: >> Perhaps you've missed one thing.
: >>
: >>[snip]
: >>
: >> Perl 6 could provide a pragma to produce a warning o
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:30:00AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
>
> Glenn wrote:
>
>> > Have I missed anything?
>>
>> Perhaps you've missed one thing.
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>> Perl 6 could provide a pragma to produce a warning on the first
>> run-time auto-numerificat
Glenn wrote:
> > Have I missed anything?
>
> Perhaps you've missed one thing.
>
>[snip]
>
> Perl 6 could provide a pragma to produce a warning on the first
> run-time auto-numerification (compile time would be really hard to
> do), together with a selection of diff
Damian Conway wrote:
> Have I missed anything?
Perhaps you've missed one thing. It was kind of in a different branch of the
thread, about string numerification yielding NaN when given input that is "bad"
according to some definition of "badness". It was clear from discussion that
various contr
