Mark Kvale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:As one of the 3 or 4 people in the world that understands the p5 engine, we
:would welcome your input.
'Understands' is a rather strong word ...
:The current thinking, and a5 just reinforces it, is that regexes will be
:compiled down to Parrot bytecode, s
On Thursday 06 June 2002 00:33, Hugo van der Sanden wrote:
> No, not attached. :)
>
> Just wanted to write down a thought I had during the discussion
> phase, about how someone might go about implementing it.
>
> This might be more obvious to someone who hasn't been corrupted
> by the p5 engine, b
No, not attached. :)
Just wanted to write down a thought I had during the discussion
phase, about how someone might go about implementing it.
This might be more obvious to someone who hasn't been corrupted
by the p5 engine, but it is about what you do when you hit the
'success' state - the p5 en
