Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I checked in more of PDD 17, detailing parrot's base types. Some of
those types definitely don't exist (like, say, the string and bignum
type...) and could definitely use implementing. Should be fairly
Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
In the mean time i fixed some things that were wrong, added a few
functions and the tests. I found some weird things while doing this,
probably bugs. So here's the patch i promised.
Can you please rediff string.pmc - it is in the CVS already, but you did
provide the
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I checked in more of PDD 17, detailing parrot's base types. Some of
those types definitely don't exist (like, say, the string and bignum
type...) and could definitely use
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry this one sat so long. (Piers reminded me with the summary)
It worked then '
And not for the first time
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I checked in more of PDD 17, detailing parrot's base types. Some of
those types definitely don't exist (like, say, the string and bignum
type...) and could definitely use implementing. Should be fairly
straightforward,
Ion Alexandru Morega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, i'm new to this list and to parrot programming, so i decided to
start with something simple. I implemented a String PMC that is pretty
much complete, it compiles, but i haven't tested it yet. It would be
great if someone had a look at it,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Ion Alexandru Morega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, i'm new to this list and to parrot programming, so i decided to
start with something simple. I implemented a String PMC that is pretty
much complete, it compiles, but i haven't tested it yet.
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I checked in more of PDD 17, detailing parrot's base types. Some of
those types definitely don't exist (like, say, the string and bignum
type...) and could definitely use implementing. Should be fairly
straightforward, and would be a good way to get up to speed on writing
I checked in more of PDD 17, detailing parrot's base types. Some of
those types definitely don't exist (like, say, the string and bignum
type...) and could definitely use implementing. Should be fairly
straightforward, and would be a good way to get up to speed on
writing PMC classes.
--
