[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The way people seem to be showing the status of RFCs is by putting
> "Status: foo" up near the maintainer info etc. This makes good sense.
> Can this be reflected in the sample RFC and the instructions and so on?
I've been asking Adam to do this, but I suspect he's ra
--
>From: Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Automated "no status" messages
>Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 09:20:01 -0700
>
>At 05:31 PM 8/28/00 +1000, you wrote:
>>I've just run a nasty hairy script over the RFC repository an
I've just run a nasty hairy script over the RFC repository and sent
email to those people who I think have language RFCs but haven't put
statuses on them yet.
My aim in this is to figure out which RFCs are still actively under
discussion and which aren't. Some people haven't updated their RFCs
