Matt Diephouse wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 11:44:06 +0200, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) pop off the buffered I/O layer:
Here's a patch that uses option one.
Thanks, applied,
leo
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 11:44:06 +0200, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are several ways to adapt the code to the new behavior:
>
> 1) pop off the buffered I/O layer:
>
> getstdout Px
> Sx = pop Px# Sx = 'buf'
Here's a patch that uses option one.
--
matt
buffe
Matt Diephouse wrote:
Somewhere, the prompt for the interpreter ("> ") started getting
buffered.
Yep. Last time this came up, I summarized:
There are several ways to adapt the code to the new behavior:
1) pop off the buffered I/O layer:
getstdout Px
Sx = pop Px# Sx = 'buf'
2) explici
I was looking at Parrot Forth tonight and was extremely confused for
the longest time because no prompt was getting printed. I figured I
just didn't know how to use the thing. But that's not the case.
Somewhere, the prompt for the interpreter ("> ") started getting
buffered. It's not printing beca
