Hi,
Jacinta Richardson wrote:
> Juerd wrote:
[CGI.pm et al]
>> Yes, this needs to be redesigned completely. Are you volunteering?
>
> Is this still needed? If so yes, I'm now volunteering! Where'd you
> like me to start?
I'd like to point out that this might be a good idea for a perl6
microgra
At 10:23 AM +0200 4/15/07, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
Please read these two posts to this list:
http://groups.google.nl/group/perl.perl6.users/browse_thread/thread/845b10b8ed7266/a209deddfadad19b?lnk=st&q=juerd+web+development&rnum=1#a209deddfadad19b
http://groups.google.nl/group/perl.perl6.users/brow
Darren Duncan skribis 2007-04-14 23:37 (-0700):
> Presumably Juerd will get back to these when he has the tuits, but
> meanwhile you could try improving what he started.
Indeed.
Please read these two posts to this list:
http://groups.google.nl/group/perl.perl6.users/browse_thread/thread/845b10b8
At 12:53 PM +1000 4/15/07, Jacinta Richardson wrote:
Juerd wrote:
Jacinta Richardson skribis 2006-09-21 0:13 (+1000):
My biggest gripe with CGI's html methods is the inconsistency in their
names. I use them every now and then, but I always have to go and look
up the documentation. It's "text
Juerd wrote:
Jacinta Richardson skribis 2006-09-21 0:13 (+1000):
My biggest gripe with CGI's html methods is the inconsistency in their
names. I use them every now and then, but I always have to go and look
up the documentation. It's "textfield" isn't it? So that would make
this one "passwor
