Re: [Maybe Spam] Coverage testing success story.

On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 09:32:51PM -0600, Michael Carman wrote: > > I think this is the most valuable part of the exercise - the bugs you find > > when you think 'its got 98% coverage, there cant possibly be any bugs > > left...oh, look' > > With a little luck, that's when it finally sinks that co

Re: [Maybe Spam] Coverage testing success story.

On 12/14/2004 6:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> So even when you approach 100% there's still bugs to be found with simple >> coverage analysis. > > I think this is the most valuable part of the exercise - the bugs you find > when you think 'its got 98% coverage

Re: [Maybe Spam] Coverage testing success story.

You may be interested in what I found on my journey to 100% coverage with D::C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So even when you approach 100% there's still bugs to be found with simple coverage analysis. I think this is the most valuable part of the exercise - t

Coverage testing success story.

Devel::Cover has been giving Test::More some indigestion lately. Threads. Bleh. Paul put out a new version so I figured I'd try it out. It faired reasonably well, everything but the threaded stuff ran better than the last version. So I looked at the coverage output. -