Re: [yapc] DOC: glossary

2006-07-03 Thread Jose Castro
On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:23 PM, Uri Guttman wrote: hi to all docathon hackers (and others too), one idea we came up with during the docathon is that perl6 needs a glossary. would the terms autobox or mixin make any sense to a newcomer who didn't know any OO theory? so this is a proposal to

RE: [yapc] DOC: glossary

2006-07-03 Thread York, Joel
] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uri Guttman Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 5:24 PM To: perl6-language@perl.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [yapc] DOC: glossary hi to all docathon hackers (and others too), one idea we came up with during

DOC: glossary

2006-07-02 Thread Uri Guttman
hi to all docathon hackers (and others too), one idea we came up with during the docathon is that perl6 needs a glossary. would the terms autobox or mixin make any sense to a newcomer who didn't know any OO theory? so this is a proposal to start a glossary as a new S\d+ or other document. here

Re: DOC: glossary

2006-07-02 Thread Juerd
I haven't actually read your message, just the Subject, because I was just going to bed. Be sure to check out http://pugs.kwiki.org/?Perl6Nomenclature Juerd -- http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html