On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 12:44, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> > So, as you can see, in the case of mixins, the hypothetical:
> >
> > role z {
> > has not mymeth;
> > }
Sorry, my bad. I wandered sideways into talking about methods. "has", of
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:58, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
It also might be useful for roles to be able to delete members and
methods from a class like so:
role foo {
has $.x;
has no
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 10:49, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> Quoting S12:
>
> A class's method definition hides any role definition of the
> same name, so role methods are second-class citizens. On the
> other hand, role methods are still part of the class itself, so
> they
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:58, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
>
> > It also might be useful for roles to be able to delete members and
> > methods from a class like so:
> >
> > role foo {
> > has $.x;
> > has not $.y;
> > }
>
> But
