Moin,
On Thursday 26 January 2006 15:26, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
I finally found some tuits to work on CPANTS again. As the previous
implementation had some drawbacks, I started from scratch, and from
another direction.
I just uploaded Module::CPANTS::Analyse to CPAN. MCA contains most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tels wrote:
However, I am _really really_ starting to wonder whether we need a
Kwalitee rating based on *excessive usage of prerequisites*.
Doing work based on existing CPAN modules instead of reinventing the
wheel by oneself is typically
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Tels wrote:
I am still considering building something[0] that shows the
module-dependency as a graph to show how bad the problem has become.
[0] As soon as I can extract the nec. data from CPANTS, which has failed
the last two times I tried that
Hi!
I finally found some tuits to work on CPANTS again. As the previous
implementation had some drawbacks, I started from scratch, and from
another direction.
I just uploaded Module::CPANTS::Analyse to CPAN. MCA contains most of
the previous Kwalitee indicators and some code to check if one
