[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The way people seem to be showing the status of RFCs is by putting
> "Status: foo" up near the maintainer info etc. This makes good sense.
> Can this be reflected in the sample RFC and the instructions and so on?
I've been asking Adam to do this, but I suspect he's ra
The way people seem to be showing the status of RFCs is by putting
"Status: foo" up near the maintainer info etc. This makes good sense.
Can this be reflected in the sample RFC and the instructions and so on?
K.
- Forwarded message from Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>From: Peter Sc
