On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Bob Rogers wrote:
From: Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:43:24 -0500 (EST)
Please verify that it actually works, first. Last I checked (Friday) it
didn't, due to linker issues. I also recall some guesswork on the list
about
On Monday 14 January 2008 08:56:08 Andy Dougherty wrote:
It doesn't work for me on Solaris. What to do with that information,
I leave up to you.
The next step is to get some debugging information.
What's the generated compilation line?
What's wrong with it?
What should the right one be?
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, chromatic wrote:
On Monday 14 January 2008 08:56:08 Andy Dougherty wrote:
It doesn't work for me on Solaris. What to do with that information,
I leave up to you.
The next step is to get some debugging information.
What's the generated compilation line?
What's
On Jan 12, 2008 11:22 PM, Bob Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 0.5.2 release is coming up this Tuesday (January 15), so I've
updated NEWS with a summary of changes since 0.5.1 based on the commit
logs, which I've also included below. Please take a look and make sure
I haven't
On Saturday 12 January 2008 20:14:55 Andy Lester wrote:
It's a start, but how about this:
--- begin ---
Parrot 0.5.2 brings a major new feature to users: The ability to build
a perl6 executable.
Parrot has been creating bytecode for years, but the conversion of
these Parrot bytecode, or
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
Please put something in the top, shouting from the rooftops, that we can now
say make perl6.
Please verify that it actually works, first. Last I checked (Friday) it
didn't, due to linker issues. I also recall some guesswork on the list
about shared
From: chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:59:20 -0800
On Saturday 12 January 2008 20:14:55 Andy Lester wrote:
Parrot 0.5.2 brings a major new feature to users: The ability to build
a perl6 executable.
Parrot has been creating bytecode for years, but the
On Jan 13, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
If there is any doubt, it would be better to wait, and let it mature a
bit. We can always shout it from the rooftops at the next release.
I disagree. It need not be perfect, and I'd like to keep this
momentum going. Even if you have to do
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 02:43:24PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
Please also verify that you want to publicly announce the name of the
executable as 'perl6'. I recall there was some question about that too,
though I wasn't involved in any of it, so I don't know where it stands at
the moment.
The 0.5.2 release is coming up this Tuesday (January 15), so I've
updated NEWS with a summary of changes since 0.5.1 based on the commit
logs, which I've also included below. Please take a look and make sure
I haven't misrepresented anything, especially in the languages and
compilers
On Jan 12, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
- Implementation
+ New pbc_to_exe utility turns bytecode to executables
Please put something in the top, shouting from the rooftops, that we
can now say make perl6. That pbc_to_exe is interesting to core
people, maybe, but make perl6 is
From: Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:31:36 -0600
On Jan 12, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
- Implementation
+ New pbc_to_exe utility turns bytecode to executables
Please put something in the top, shouting from the rooftops, that we
can now
On Jan 12, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
How about leading with
- make perl6 now builds a Perl6 executable
as a section of its own?
It's a start, but how about this:
--- begin ---
Parrot 0.5.2 brings a major new feature to users: The ability to build
a perl6 executable.
From: Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:14:55 -0600
On Jan 12, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
How about leading with
- make perl6 now builds a Perl6 executable
as a section of its own?
It's a start, but how about this:
One line is
On Jan 12, 2008, at 10:26 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
One line is fine for NEWS, I think.
Text is cheap. If people want to skip past it, they can. We need to
be talking more about what we're doing. Consider the outside person
who's only vaguely, if at all, familiar with Parrot. pbc_to_exe
On Jan 12, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
We need to be talking more about what we're doing. Consider the
outside person who's only vaguely, if at all, familiar with Parrot.
pbc_to_exe means nothing to them.
++
---
Matisse
From: Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:29:24 -0600
On Jan 12, 2008, at 10:26 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
One line is fine for NEWS, I think.
Text is cheap. If people want to skip past it, they can. We need to
be talking more about what we're doing.
On Jan 12, 2008, at 11:33 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
One line is fine for NEWS, I think.
Text is cheap. If people want to skip past it, they can. We need
to
be talking more about what we're doing. Consider the outside person
who's only vaguely, if at all, familiar with Parrot.
18 matches
Mail list logo
