Re: Grammar (take V.00I_0I)

2002-07-16 Thread Luke Palmer
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, John Porter wrote: > In his P6 Summary for 2002-07-14, in section > "Perl 6 grammar, take 5", Piers says: > > someone pointed out that [the grammar] had a problem > with code like > >{ some_function_returning_a_hash() } > > Should it give a closure? Or

Re: Grammar (take V.00I_0I)

2002-07-16 Thread John Porter
In his P6 Summary for 2002-07-14, in section "Perl 6 grammar, take 5", Piers says: someone pointed out that [the grammar] had a problem with code like { some_function_returning_a_hash() } Should it give a closure? Or a hash ref? Larry hasn't commented so far. I couldn'

Grammar (take V.00I_0I)

2002-07-15 Thread Sean O'Rourke
The short version: This is intended to be the "cleaned up to check into the Parrot tree" version Dan mentioned, so now would be a good time to yell if you have problems with it. The documentation is much better (or at least larger) than that in the previous version. You _will_ run into bugs, but