On 2019-12-09 00:46, Fernando Santagata wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:38 AM Fernando Santagata
mailto:nando.santag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
It can be used this way:
$ raku -e'say „Hello!“'
Hello!
But it must be used with that closing quote '“' (U+201C); it cannot
be used
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 03:54 Fernando Santagata
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:38 AM Fernando Santagata <
> nando.santag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It can be used this way:
>>
>> $ raku -e'say „Hello!“'
>> Hello!
>> But it must be used with that closing quote '“' (U+201C); it cannot be
>> used
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:38 AM Fernando Santagata
wrote:
> It can be used this way:
>
> $ raku -e'say „Hello!“'
> Hello!
> But it must be used with that closing quote '“' (U+201C); it cannot be
> used paired with itself:
>
There's another quotation mark that can be used with '„', it's '”'
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 1:27 AM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users <
perl6-us...@perl.org> wrote:
> What is the unicode for the subscript double quote „ ?
>
That's U+201E
and can it be used together with the regular
> quote the same as 「」 ?
>
It can be used this way:
$ raku -e'say „Hello!“'
Hello!
On 2019-12-08 19:34, Brad Gilbert wrote:
I like to use them, but I am not you.
Hi Brad,
I am going to create a keeper and give it a shot!
It is not like I don't have four or five of them
open when I am programming
:-)
-T
I like to use them, but I am not you.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 8:19 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users <
perl6-us...@perl.org> wrote:
> On 2019-12-08 18:04, Brad Gilbert wrote:
> > I do not quite understand the question.
> >
> > I told you how to directly enter unicode by remembering the codepoint.
>
On 2019-12-08 18:04, Brad Gilbert wrote:
I do not quite understand the question.
I told you how to directly enter unicode by remembering the codepoint.
It's still the same characters.
I would definitely recommend setting up, and getting used to Compose keys.
I use them all the time for
I do not quite understand the question.
I told you how to directly enter unicode by remembering the codepoint.
It's still the same characters.
I would definitely recommend setting up, and getting used to Compose keys.
I use them all the time for things like « » ‘ ’ “ ” ¹²³⁴⁵⁶⁷⁸⁹⁰¯⁺≠
On Sun,
On 2019-12-08 06:22, Brad Gilbert wrote:
Personally though I just use 「Ctrl+Shift+u f f 6 2 Space」 and
「Ctrl+Shift+u f f 6 3 Space」
Hi Brad,
Your technical opinion: is it better for maintainability
to stick with escape sequences or to use the unicodes?
I ask as I will never remember them.
On 2019-12-08 08:46, Fernando Santagata wrote:
You won't believe it :-) but Raku's wonderful documentation has a page
on how to enter Unicode characters:
https://docs.raku.org/language/unicode_entry
Hi Fernando,
Oh they sure do go to town on that one! That page is
nicely done.
What is the
On 2019-12-08 06:22, Brad Gilbert wrote:
Personally though I just use 「Ctrl+Shift+u f f 6 2 Space」 and
「Ctrl+Shift+u f f 6 3 Space」
So basically I just remember how to directly type in Unicode codepoints,
and those the two codepoints.
Taught me something new. Thank you!
You won't believe it :-) but Raku's wonderful documentation has a page on
how to enter Unicode characters:
https://docs.raku.org/language/unicode_entry
That page also links to a GitHub project which offers a .XCompose ready to
use.
I started from that and added some faster and easier (for me) to
I would recommend setting up a compose key.
But that is not enough because I don't think it has a binding for those two
characters.
So you would also have to modify the config to include them.
I think that 「Compose [ [ 」 and 「Compose ] ] 」 might be what I would set
them as.
Note that 「‘」 is
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 12:51 AM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users
> mailto:perl6-us...@perl.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is there a `Q[]` that can be used in a regex?
>
> I am looking for how to get around
>
> my $x = Q[\:\\::]; ( my $y = $x ) ~~ s/ '' /x/; say $y
> \:x::
>
>
The shortcut spelling of Q[…] is to use 「 and 」 (U+FF62 and U+FF63)
my $x = 「\:\\::」; ( my $y = $x ) ~~ s/ 「\\」 /x/; say $y
\:\\::
The case could be made that \Q[\\] should work as well. (It would need to
be added).
(Along with \q[…] and \qq[…])
Note that \Q[…] doesn't work in string
Hi All,
Is there a `Q[]` that can be used in a regex?
I am looking for how to get around
my $x = Q[\:\\::]; ( my $y = $x ) ~~ s/ '' /x/; say $y
\:x::
This does not work:
my $x = Q[\:\\::]; ( my $y = $x ) ~~ s/ Q[\\] /x/; say $y
\:\\::
Nor does this:
my $x = Q[\:\\::]; ( my $y = $x ) ~~
16 matches
Mail list logo