Re: Inconsistencies with "with" chained to "for"

2022-08-28 Thread Fernando Santagata
Hi Vadim, Thank you! I opened issue #5049. On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 12:56 AM Vadim Belman wrote: > > Looks like it worth a bug report. I was probably stumbling upon this too > for a couple of times. > > Best regards, > Vadim Belman > > > On Aug 27, 2022, at 2:24 AM, Fernando Santagata < >

Re: Inconsistencies with "with" chained to "for"

2022-08-27 Thread Vadim Belman
Looks like it worth a bug report. I was probably stumbling upon this too for a couple of times. Best regards, Vadim Belman > On Aug 27, 2022, at 2:24 AM, Fernando Santagata > wrote: > > Hello, > I noticed this behavior: > > [0] > my @a = > [a b c d e] > [1] > .say with $_ for @a > () >

Inconsistencies with "with" chained to "for"

2022-08-27 Thread Fernando Santagata
Hello, I noticed this behavior: [0] > my @a = [a b c d e] [1] > .say with $_ for @a () [2] > .say if .defined for @a a b c d e [3] > (.say with $_) for @a a b c d e [4] > (.say if .defined) for @a a b c d e Apparently in this case "with" works only as a statement modifier while "if" works both