Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
Is this still an issue?
If so, can we enumerate the exact things we want this ticket to address?
There's nothing in this area I know of that needs addressing. I suggest
closing the ticket and if we find any specific issues relating to this,
we can open one w
Is this still an issue?
If so, can we enumerate the exact things we want this ticket to address?
Pm
Is this still an issue?
If so, can we enumerate the exact things we want this ticket to address?
Pm
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #57968]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57968 >
- awaiting .HLL capabilities
At 2:21 PM +0200 9/3/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ resent ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:17:52 +0200
Subject: Integer PMCs
Fog around integer PMC semantics is lifting, so we should start bringing
classes/*.pmc into shape.
Currently PerlInt is the most complete implementation of the proposed
semantics
[ resent ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:17:52 +0200
Subject: Integer PMCs
Fog around integer PMC semantics is lifting, so we should start bringing
classes/*.pmc into shape.
Currently PerlInt is the most complete implementation of the proposed
semantics. Some vtable methods like C still need work
Fog around integer PMC semantics is lifting, so we should start bringing
classes/*.pmc into shape.
Currently PerlInt is the most complete implementation of the proposed
semantics. Some vtable methods like C still need work, though.
Anyway, I'd do:
1) cp perlint.pmc integer.pmc
2) pmclass PerlIn
