Imagine a combined hash/array CONTAINER type. The difference between
hashes and arrays becomes that arrays are restricted to non-negative integer
key values. @grumpy and %grumpy can even have the same head node in their
data structure, but the accessors will, unless told otherwise, only pick o
[Apologies for the late reply. Still catching up]
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:51:01 -0500, David L. Nicol said:
> What if its a method of anything in an array? $_ is already
> a reference to the object on the array in for loops rather
> than a copy of it. What if we make change be not something a
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > $item:n would be the position $item had in the last container it was in
>
> $item:i, you surely meant? $item:n would be the size of the list...
The size of the list would be something like $#{$item:contained_in}
the size of the list is not a property of the item, s
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 03:46:10AM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
> Mike Pastore wrote:
> >
> > Any thoughts on this?
Yes, please, the idea, that is: I've wanted such a variable oftentimes.
What I'm not certain about is reusing the $#. Reusing obsoleted stuff
is Dangerous.
> Attributes.
>
> ($
Mike Pastore wrote:
>
> Any thoughts on this?
Attributes.
($item : arrayposition) would tell us what the position is.
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does despair.com sell a discordian calendar?
"David L. Nicol" wrote:
>
> What if its a method of anything in an array? $_ is already
> a reference to the object on the array in for loops rather
> than a copy of it. What if we make change be not something about
> for loops, but about anything in an array?
>
> print "The index, in
"David L. Nicol" wrote:
>
> What if its a method of anything in an array? $_ is already
> a reference to the object on the array in for loops rather
> than a copy of it. What if we make change be not something about
> for loops, but about anything in an array?
>
> print "The index, in
What if its a method of anything in an array? $_ is already
a reference to the object on the array in for loops rather
than a copy of it. What if we make change be not something about
for loops, but about anything in an array?
print "The index, in its array, of <<$_>> is $CORE::ARRAY
