Re: More flexible POD

2009-08-11 Thread Mark Overmeer
Being on holidays, it is not easy to follow threads closely, so if I repeat things other people have said already, I apologize beforehand. My responses may b late as well. Two years ago, I discussed various options, which compared POD to features in to other languages and suggested various syntax

Fwd: More flexible POD

2009-08-10 Thread Matthew Walton
Woops - forgot to reply all (I'm on an irritating mixture of lists which set reply-to and don't, and I never remember which is which). Sorry! -- Forwarded message -- From: Matthew Walton Date: Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:10 AM Subject: Re: More flexible POD To: Jon Lang

More flexible POD

2009-08-10 Thread Jon Lang
Masak's Journal[1] identifies a couple of problems involving the interaction of POD with block-form classes - one in the article itself, and another in the comments that follow. The first is that a mixture of indented block-form classes and non-indented POD is visually very ugly. The second is th