# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #41371]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41371 >
committed as docs/roles_responsibilities.pod in r16834, project team
members should review
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 14:09, Jerry Gay wrote:
> currently failing tests (r15072, x86, msvc-7.1, perl-5.8.8) are:
It may be easier to classify these on the smoke server:
http://smoke.parrotcode.org/smoke/
Run "make smoke" to collect and upload the data. I just did a run for
Linux/
I get most of these failures plus:
t/compilers/imcc/syn/pcc.t 1 256211 4.76% 11
t/examples/library.t 1 256 41 25.00% 3
t/library/pcre.t 1 256 11 100.00% 1
t/library/pg.t 0 6430 0.
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #40632]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40632 >
currently failing tests (r15072, x86, msvc-7.1, perl-5.8.8) are:
Failed Test
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:42:50AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> The next release is delayed a bit, you might already have noticed that.
>
> The reason is: GPW (German Perl Workshop) is at the beginning of March,
> then a hackaton with Audrey will follow. This would collide with
The next release is delayed a bit, you might already have noticed that.
The reason is: GPW (German Perl Workshop) is at the beginning of March,
then a hackaton with Audrey will follow. This would collide with the
March release. Therefore I've postponed this release until next week.
BTW
The next monthly release is due on next weekend (probably Sunday).
* consider the src tree is mildly frozen
* no more feature patches please
* tests, consolidation of current, especially recent OS.pmc on various
platforms, is highly welcome
* bug fixes, doc updates as well
Thanks,
leo
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> What still needs to be done:
> - CLI options need some minor tweaks
I think they need some major design. In particular, it would be
nice to have a documented consistent interface to setting or
unsetting various things. Then, it would be *very* nice
On 12/5/05, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not just the steps themselves need work, there is still some fairly
> substantial work left to be done on the configure framework as part of
> my refactoring project. This has been going rather slowly because it's
> usually bad to major radic
"Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* interfaces: start some brainstorming, what we might need in Parrot core
Having these would be great for the work I'm doing on the .NET => PIR
translator. Also I would really like to have support for:-
* Static methods
* Class level attributes (as
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 06:37:25PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> This is an unordered collection of my thoughts towards a next release:
> * config module cleanup: auto/jit.pm and gen/icu.pm comes to my mind
> (and why /gen anyway?)
Not just the steps themselves need work, there is s
> Something else?
I would be pleased to have a design decision made regarding inheritance
of attributes in Parrot objects.
See the last few comments here:
https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36411
for the design questions that arose.
Regards,
Roger Browne
This is an unordered collection of my thoughts towards a next release:
* namespaces: create a PDD based on Matt's document
* interfaces: start some brainstorming, what we might need in Parrot
core
* bytecode & library loading: needs rewriting and major cleanup
* config module clea
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
- please test on all available platforms and 'make smoke' and/or
update PLATFORMS
With the recent Stash changes and (I presume) a fix to avoid reloading
pbc files, we're passing all tests on HP-UX!
Something's happened to spoil languages in the last day, but I don't b
The next release is due this weekend. I'll start release procedure at
Sun 4th, ~13:00 UTC.
The usual terms apply:
- no bigger changes to Parrot core, especially nothing that could break
the build or Parrot
- please test on all available platforms and 'make smoke' and/or up
The next release 0.3.1. will happen at Sun 6th. I'll start the release
procedure around 12:00 UTC - please no checkins at all after this time
until further notice.
There is kind of a feature freeze from now on, which means: please make
sure that nothing breaks. Parrot corrently tests 10
At 07:50 AM 3/7/2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Roger Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:01 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> 4.1.1) implement a language pragma in assembler, e.g.:
>>
>> .HL_language Python
Sounds good to me except that I would prefer you remove the HL_
and
Roger Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:01 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> 4.1.1) implement a language pragma in assembler, e.g.:
>>
>> .HL_language Python
> A pragma like that seems to split high-level languages into two groups:
> those that are specially known to p
es, and would create a BirdCharacter if the calling
language was "Bird", but would create a PyInt if the calling language
was "Python".
I hope this makes some sense, and that you can see some merit in it.
> Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond.
I'd be
Below inline/attached is a proposal for Parrot core changes. I'll post a
more detailed proposal for 1) objects in a minute.
leo
Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond.
These are numbered just for reference but are else in no particular
order. A lot can be done in parallel.
While I realize that Leo's doing conference stuff at the moment, I'd
like to start thinking about the next release. For this, I think I'd
specifically like to shoot for the redo of classes/ -- getting all
the PMCs we *want* actually in and working, and the ones we don'
On May 24, 2004, at 4:02 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Any idea when the next release of Test::More will be available?
We could use a new version of Test::Harness, too, given this bug:
https://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=5649
It bit me again yesterday. I first noticed it with DBI.
Regards,
David
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 07:50:40AM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
> On May 24, 2004, at 4:02 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> >Any idea when the next release of Test::More will be available?
>
> We could use a new version of Test::Harness, too, given this bug:
>
> https://rt.cpa
Any idea when the next release of Test::More will be available?
The last development release was Test-Simple-0.48_01 November 2002
That one uses a string for $VERSION which contains an underscore
so for people with it installed "perl Makefile.PL" for the DBI says:
> Argument &q
24 matches
Mail list logo
