RE: Notifications

2003-09-01 Thread Gordon Henriksen
also useful to have notifications before an operation--or even during the operation, if the notification is an end unto itself. Typically, notifications are named with future tense (DogWillPoop) and past tense (DogDidPoop or DogPooped) to indicate whether they preceed or follow the action. Sometimes

Re: Notifications

2003-08-31 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 07:26:25PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: How does it work? Simple. When a watched resource does what we're watching for (it changes, an entry is deleted, an entry is added [...] Only after the action being watched is performed I presume. Any implementation details?

Notifications

2003-08-29 Thread Dan Sugalski
table for can be handled with notifications. (And they can tie it in those cases where a notification is insufficient) What does this have to do with weak references? Weak references are just references that aren't part of the root set and have a destruction notification pending on the thing

Re: Notifications

2003-08-29 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 07:26:25PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: What is a notification system? Well, what it is is a simple system that posts an event when a watched resource is changed. We're going to watch modification, deletion, addition, and destruction. How does it work? Simple. When a

Re: Notifications

2003-08-29 Thread Piers Cawley
. Very simple. Why? Because there's all sorts of stuff we need to watch for performance reasons. My first thought on reading this was it would be rather useful for debugger watch-expressions. Notifications are great for all sorts of things. They're classically part of what you want for MVC