Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> This would give us one additional pointer.
>>
>> Comments welcome
> Go for it. This won't increase the size of the struct, so I can't think of
> a good reason to not do it.
Done (modulo jit_debug stabs)
>
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> This would give us one additional pointer.
>
> Comments welcome
Go for it. This won't increase the size of the struct, so I can't think of
a good reason to not do it.
Dan
The current layout of all PObjs has a C which looks like:
typedef union UnionVal {
INTVAL int_val; /* PMC unionval members */
FLOATVAL num_val;
DPOINTER* struct_val;
struct parrot_string_t * string_val;
PMC* pmc_val;
struct {/* Buffers structu
