Re: Parallelism and Concurrency was Re: Ideas for a (nntp: message 14 of 20) Object-Belongs-to-Thread threading model

2010-05-14 Thread nigelsandever
On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:58:00 +0100, Daniel Ruoso - dan...@ruoso.com +nntp+browseruk+d52dbf78bb.daniel#ruoso@spamgourmet.com wrote: Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 15:48 +0400, Richard Hainsworth escreveu: The less, or rather the more abstract, the specification in perl6, the less likely perl6 will

Re: Parallelism and Concurrency was Re: Ideas for a (nntp: message 14 of 20) Object-Belongs-to-Thread threading model

2010-05-14 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Sex, 2010-05-14 às 18:13 +0100, nigelsande...@btconnect.com escreveu: The point I(we)'ve been trying to make is that once you have a reentrant interpreter, and the ability to spawn one in an OS thread, all the other bits can be built on top. But unless you have that ability, whilst the