On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:26:12PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
>But what I really meant was: Shouldn't Parrot do a 'setrlimit' on
> itself in order to detect these sorts of bugs sooner, and more usefully?
> Or, maybe 'ulimit -s' would be appropriate before running test cases?
Running the test su
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:50:35 +0200
Am Montag, 17. Juli 2006 03:30 schrieb Bob Rogers:
> BTW, it doesn't seem right that I can run Parrot for only a second or
> two and get more than 300K stack frames deep. Isn't there a way to
> li
