"Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Better names and/or solutions welcome.
Chip has blessed this feature with a name - ":unique_reg" - and I've just
checked in the same stuff as before, but with the accepted name in place of
:non_volatile.
Jonathan
"Chip Salzenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please revert this change,
Done, along with the docs and test changes relating to it.
and refrain from checking in user-visible or
design-significant changes to the core until I've OK'd them.
Had mentioned this to leo, who said it sounded sane, and
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 11:21:24PM -, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Earlier today I checked in a change that lets you add a :non_volatile flag
> to a local or parameter.
>
> .param int i :non_volatile
> .local int j :non_volatile
>
> This says to the register allocator "don't re-use the regi
