On Feb 19, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
There's a benchmark of Ruby implementations at
http://www.antoniocangiano.com/articles/2007/02/19/ruby-
implementations-shootout-ruby-vs-yarv-vs-jruby-vs-gardens-point-ruby-
net-vs-rubinius-vs-cardinal
(or http://xrl.us/uy5m )
There's a
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:05:30AM -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
Also, looking through the gcc manpage, one thing caught my eye about
optimizing, with regards to CG and CGP. Note: When compiling a
program using computed gotos, a GCC extension, you may get better
runtime performance if you
There's a benchmark of Ruby implementations at
http://www.antoniocangiano.com/articles/2007/02/19/ruby-implementations-shootout-ruby-vs-yarv-vs-jruby-vs-gardens-point-ruby-net-vs-rubinius-vs-cardinal
(or http://xrl.us/uy5m )
There's a comment from Matt Diephouse
Did you build an optimized
The cardinal numbers are most likely all bogus.
I'm surprised that any benchmarks ran at all.
The current cardinal implementation is extremely minimal. Basically
simple arithmetic.
Kevin
Nicholas Clark wrote:
There's a benchmark of Ruby implementations at
