Q: pdd03 calling conventions

While trying to implement pdd03 inside the PIR assembler I'm not too sure if I get everything right from pdd03. Currently I have this: - a subroutine call can be prototyped or non_prototyped - a subroutine definition can be both and un_prototyped. In the latter case it checks CI0 and takes

Re: Q: pdd03 calling conventions

While trying to implement pdd03 inside the PIR assembler I'm not too sure if I get everything right from pdd03. Currently I have this: - a subroutine call can be prototyped or non_prototyped - a subroutine definition can be both and un_prototyped. In the latter case it checks CI0 and

Re: Q: pdd03 calling conventions

At 10:24 +0200 7/31/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: While trying to implement pdd03 inside the PIR assembler I'm not too sure if I get everything right from pdd03. Currently I have this: - a subroutine call can be prototyped or non_prototyped - a subroutine definition can be both and un_prototyped.