Re: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-29 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:53:25AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Garrett Goebel wrote: Many thanks for the links (searching for this stuff is a pain, there are too many results ;-) Anyway: - are there platforms with quad precision floats out there? sparc Solaris and Irix both have 16

RE: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-29 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 17:12, Garrett Goebel wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: - 8/12 byte float issues are still the same - are these formats really portable, or should we try to store ASCII equivalents? No? ? Because my knowledge here approaches zero, so I'm just aping

Re: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-29 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 04:56, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:53:25AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Garrett Goebel wrote: Many thanks for the links (searching for this stuff is a pain, there are too many results ;-) Anyway: - are there platforms with quad precision

RE: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-29 Thread Garrett Goebel
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Anyway: - are there platforms with quad precision floats out there? Several documents refer to quad precision hardware, but I can't find direct references to any. - or should 12 byte long doubles get converted to 8 byte IEEE doubles. Perhaps the following quote from

RE: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-28 Thread Garrett Goebel
Leopold Toetsch wrote: - 8/12 byte float issues are still the same - are these formats really portable, or should we try to store ASCII equivalents? No? ? Because my knowledge here approaches zero, so I'm just aping information back at you from google searches and scanning documents.

Re: [CVS ci] packfile #2

2003-01-28 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Garrett Goebel wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: - 8/12 byte float issues are still the same - are these formats really portable, or should we try to store ASCII equivalents? No? ? Because my knowledge here approaches zero, so I'm just aping information back at you from google