Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-23 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Josh Wilmes wrote: If all MANIFEST is is a list of all files in CVS, there are much easier ways to get it. As I understand it, it's supposed to be a list of what goes into a tarball to release the program, which might be a subset of what stays in CVS. Honestly

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote: The following patch brings the MANIFEST file up-to-date with recent additions. I haven't committed this in case some other reorganization (e.g. moving stuff to a src/ or dev/ or doc/ directory) is underway. There are also a few minor shuffles as

RE: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Brent Dax
There should be no Makefile.in's left in the source--they've been tossed in favor of config/gen/makefiles. Andy Dougherty: # --- parrot-cvs/MANIFEST Sat Jul 13 13:04:15 2002 # +++ parrot-andy/MANIFEST Wed Jul 17 11:46:50 2002 # @@ -12,16 +12,15 @@ # VERSION # assemble.pl #

RE: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Brent Dax wrote: There should be no Makefile.in's left in the source--they've been tossed in favor of config/gen/makefiles. Fair enough. I just took what cvs handed me. It was a fresh checkout as of yesterday, updated this morning. Whoever removes those files from the

RE: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Tom Hughes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Brent Dax wrote: There should be no Makefile.in's left in the source--they've been tossed in favor of config/gen/makefiles. Fair enough. I just took what cvs handed me. It was a fresh

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-07-17 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:21:41PM +, Simon Glover wrote: Please, people, if you create new files, remember to add them to the MANIFEST. Is CVS flexible enough to let us run a manifest check on each commit and generate warnings that get sent somewhere useful if it fails? I seem to

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update [APPLIED]

2002-01-30 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Simon Glover wrote: Enclosed patch adds the new SPARC-based JIT files to the manifest, and also puts it back into alphabetical order. Simon Applied thanks.

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update

2002-01-21 Thread Melvin Smith
At 12:21 PM 1/21/2002 +, Simon Glover wrote: Please, people, if you create new files, remember to add them to the MANIFEST. Simon --- MANIFEST.oldMon Jan 21 12:17:34 2002 +++ MANIFESTMon Jan 21 12:18:47 2002 @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ examples/assembly/call.pasm

Re: [PATCH] MANIFEST update.

2001-09-18 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:38:58PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: The following patch adds some missing files to MANIFEST. It also re-sorts it for easier maintenance. It's probably a good idea to periodically run perl -MExtUtils::Manifest -e 'ExtUtils::Manifest::fullcheck' (or