On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
64-bit-int builds appear to be broken. This is from Linux/SPARC with
INTVAL='long long'. This configuration used to work quite recently.
Thanks, applied
(by me).
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Btw, can anyone advise me on getting an actual account on a natively
64-bit machine somewhere? I don't really like the model of checking in
broken code, waiting for the tinderbox to get around to testing it,
blindly fixing things, and repeating. Especially when the tinderbox
machines
From: Andy Dougherty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Btw, can anyone advise me on getting an actual account on
a natively 64-bit machine somewhere? I don't really like
the model of checking in broken code, waiting for the tinderbox
to get around to testing it, blindly fixing things, and
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 07:53:10PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:08:31PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
This won't necessarily work if sizeof(INTVAL) != sizeof(INT). (And since
the prototypes are hidden in the C file, not in a shared header file, the
compiler
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:08:31PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
This won't necessarily work if sizeof(INTVAL) != sizeof(INT). (And since
the prototypes are hidden in the C file, not in a shared header file, the
compiler doesn't warn about them.) Upon reflection, however, since the
extern
