Re: Namespace'd subs in IMCC?

2003-09-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Joseph Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: It's not layed out what it should really do. I'm towards removing this directive and let the HLL compiler deal with it. Well, in that case, would it be possible to allow : as a valid character for use in symbol names? Yep. And

Re: Namespace'd subs in IMCC?

2003-09-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leopold Toetsch: # I'm not outerly sure, if imcc should even have such a functionality. Or # at least, if there is one, it should be configurable. The name mangling # is HLL dependent and there may be no general scheme to do it right for # all kind of

Re: Namespace'd subs in IMCC?

2003-09-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Joseph Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From what I understand from the IMCC documentation, the .namespace macro prepends the namespace name plus :: to all names within it. It's for variables only, currently. I figured that this would be handy in distinguishing which class a method belongs to

Re: Namespace'd subs in IMCC?

2003-09-07 Thread Joseph Ryan
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Joseph Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From what I understand from the IMCC documentation, the .namespace macro prepends the namespace name plus :: to all names within it. It's for variables only, currently. I figured that this would be handy in distinguishing

RE: Namespace'd subs in IMCC?

2003-09-07 Thread Brent Dax
Leopold Toetsch: # I'm not outerly sure, if imcc should even have such a functionality. Or # at least, if there is one, it should be configurable. The name mangling # is HLL dependent and there may be no general scheme to do it right for # all kind of symbols. Then allow a few more symbols in