On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 05:38:33PM -0500, Matt Creenan wrote:
: It just goes to show.. the perl community has already thought of
: everything..
Plus a few things beyond everything, if you're into surreal numbers.
Larry
It just goes to show.. the perl community has already thought of
everything..
-Original Message-
From: Luke Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 12:41 PM
To: Carissa
Cc: Perl Language
Subject: Re: Operators that keep going and going...
Carissa writes:
>
Carissa writes:
> The other thought that grew from these random neurons firing was whether or
> not it would be possible to have operators that don't actually do anything
> until the data they're dependent upon changes.
I should hope that would be possible, since it's possible in Perl 5!
See perl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carissa) writes:
> Obviously the Perl6 community has accepted that it's possible to have
> variants on operators for things like vectorization. I'm wondering if there
> would be any desire, need or room for what I have so far thought of as
> "persistent" (or "Energizer Bunny") o
