Re: Transparent / Opaque references = Link / Ref

2005-05-30 Thread Juerd
"TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)" skribis 2005-05-30 8:58 (+0200): > [This is a repost, somehow it didn't get through before, sorry.] This is the fourth time it did get through to my mailbox, at least. Juerd -- http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html http:/

Re: Transparent / Opaque references = Link / Ref

2005-05-29 Thread TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)
[This is a repost, somehow it didn't get through before, sorry.] Luke wrote: > Both transparent dereferencing (infinite $$foo) and > opaque dereferencing (one-level $$foo) have their uses, but they are > definitely distinct. Well, they are more like variations on a theme. > Instead of adding d

RE: Transparent / Opaque references = Link / Ref

2005-05-28 Thread Thomas Sandlass
Luke wrote: > Both transparent dereferencing (infinite $$foo) and > opaque dereferencing (one-level $$foo) have their uses, but they are > definitely distinct. Well, they are more like variations on a theme. > Instead of adding different syntax for each > kind, I'll propose something different:

Re: Transparent / Opaque references = Link / Ref

2005-05-28 Thread Thomas Sandlass
Luke wrote: > Both transparent dereferencing (infinite $$foo) and > opaque dereferencing (one-level $$foo) have their uses, but they are > definitely distinct. Well, they are more like variations on a theme. > Instead of adding different syntax for each > kind, I'll propose something differen