Re: core_ops.pod in CVS

2001-12-26 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 08:42 AM 12/26/2001 -0800, Boris Tschirschwitz wrote: >On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Jason Gloudon wrote: > > > branch is a relative branch, look at the code generated for it: > > > > static opcode_t * > > Parrot_branch_ic (opcode_t cur_opcode[], struct Parrot_Interp * > interpreter) { > > return cur

Re: core_ops.pod in CVS

2001-12-26 Thread Boris Tschirschwitz
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Jason Gloudon wrote: > branch is a relative branch, look at the code generated for it: > > static opcode_t * > Parrot_branch_ic (opcode_t cur_opcode[], struct Parrot_Interp * interpreter) { > return cur_opcode + cur_opcode[1]; > } Yes, I see. In parrot assmebly it looks li

RE: core_ops.pod in CVS

2001-12-26 Thread Brent Dax
Boris Tschirschwitz: # Why is parrot/docs/core_ops.pod not under version control? # # For example we should change the explanation under # =item B(ic) to # # Branch to the location specified by $1 # # since that's what it does. Because core_ops.pod is generated automatically from core.ops. --