RE: wiki

2006-08-03 Thread Conrad Schneiker
From: Amir E. Aharoni There was so much talk about perl6 wiki, that i couldn't follow it anymore. Is there a currently working wiki where actual perl6 documentation can be read/written? Not that I know of, at least not in the sense of being a widely-accepted and presently-active focal

Re: RE: wiki

2006-08-03 Thread Matt Todd
I'll be honest, I was willing to put in some effort for something substantial and original, but I'm not too keen on just remaking or porting an old solution. M.T.

RE: wiki

2006-08-03 Thread Amir E. Aharoni
2006/8/3, Matt Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'll be honest, I was willing to put in some effort for something substantial and original, but I'm not too keen on just remaking or porting an old solution. M.T. Just in case i am misunderstood - i'm not talking about the platform, i'm talking about

RE: wiki

2006-08-03 Thread Conrad Schneiker
From: Amir E. Aharoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006/8/3, Matt Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'll be honest, I was willing to put in some effort for something substantial and original, but I'm not too keen on just remaking or porting an old solution. Please see my response below. Just in

Re: RE: wiki

2006-08-03 Thread Matt Todd
IMHO, this isn't a matter of either-or, but of concurrent development along 2 related tracks: You're right, it doesn't have to be either-or. [snip] It would be good to have (1) ASAP. There's no reason that people who are interested in (2) have to be interested in (1) or vice versa. I