Re: RFC: Patch for mingw-msys

2006-05-26 Thread Andrew Dougherty
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Joshua Gatcomb wrote: > On 5/26/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't know anything about either msys or mingw, so I don't really know > > what to recommend. > > > > I'm afraid I don't understand what a patch would actually try to do. > > From your pr

Re: RFC: Patch for mingw-msys

2006-05-26 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
On 5/26/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't know anything about either msys or mingw, so I don't really know what to recommend. I'm afraid I don't understand what a patch would actually try to do. From your previous message, it looks like sh.exe is changing the path delimiters

Re: RFC: Patch for mingw-msys

2006-05-26 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Joshua Gatcomb wrote: > All: > In tracking down why building parrot with mingw was failing, I discovered > that the culprit was having msys in my PATH even if I wasn't intentionally > trying to use it. > > There are 3 interesting things to note: > 1. It does not matter what

RFC: Patch for mingw-msys

2006-05-26 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
All: In tracking down why building parrot with mingw was failing, I discovered that the culprit was having msys in my PATH even if I wasn't intentionally trying to use it. There are 3 interesting things to note: 1. It does not matter what msys is actually called - renaming the directory to foo h