Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "NC" == Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> NC> $htdoc = open uri "http://www.yahoo.com" or die; with uri in the
> NC> standard library and also make it easy to stack the module that
> NC> does uri at the top of 'file' so that the defa
> "NC" == Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NC> $htdoc = open uri "http://www.yahoo.com" or die;
NC> with uri in the standard library
NC> and also make it easy to stack the module that does uri at the top of 'file'
NC> so that the default is to call the uri stuff.
Is it just me, but
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 08:26:26AM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> Hildo Biersma wrote:
> >
> > > Personally I hated it. And I distinctly remember saying so. And I
> > > still hate it.
> >
> > I dislike it too. URIs are a user-space matter and should not be
> > built-in to the language - put it in
Hildo Biersma wrote:
>
> > Personally I hated it. And I distinctly remember saying so. And I
> > still hate it.
>
> I dislike it too. URIs are a user-space matter and should not be
> built-in to the language - put it in a module. And if you have an OS
> that implements URIs directly, well then
Hildo Biersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > =head1 NOTES ON FREEZE
> > >
> > > The only comments received were on my crappy examples, which have been
> > > clarified. Everyone seemed to like the idea.
> >
> > Personally I hated it. And I distinctly remember saying so. And I
> > still hate it
> > =head1 NOTES ON FREEZE
> >
> > The only comments received were on my crappy examples, which have been
> > clarified. Everyone seemed to like the idea.
>
> Personally I hated it. And I distinctly remember saying so. And I
> still hate it.
I dislike it too. URIs are a user-space matter and sh
Perl6 RFC Librarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This and other RFCs are available on the web at
> http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
>
> =head1 TITLE
>
> Embed full URI support into Perl
>
> =head1 VERSION
>
> Maintainer: Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 14 Aug 2000
> Last-Modified: 1
> I'd rather see you drop (or footnote) the discussion of how the various
> systems are going to map content among themselves, and focus more on
> what the construct allows. For instance, returning to some of the
> original implementation ideas, that the location information be passed
> to the pr
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Nathan Wiger wrote:
>
> The only comments received were on my crappy examples, which have been
> clarified.
Well, sort of. More comments on "crappy" examples. :-)
>
> The key syntax benefit is #1. This lets us use URIs in any function to
> allow scripts that can be used
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 05:36:56AM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
>unlink "/local/etc/script.conf";# non-portable
>unlink "file:///local/etc/script.conf"; # portable
'/local/etc/script.conf' is very unlikely to exist or be a sensible
filename on Windows or MacOS (or Unix. Shou
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Embed full URI support into Perl
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Aug 2000
Last-Modified: 16 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 100
Version: 2
11 matches
Mail list logo
