On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 04:53:46PM -0400, Bryan C . Warnock wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Michael Maraist wrote:
>
>> Good idea, but you have it backwards.. If anything, there should be an
>> "explicit" keyword..
>> Remember, we want
>>
>> % perl -p -e 's/foo/bar/g' file.txt
>
>Oh, I know. I thr
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:31:48AM -0400, Michael Maraist wrote:
>> Request For New Pragma: Implicit
>
>Good idea, but you have it backwards.. If anything, there should be an
>"explicit" keyword..
This resonates well with me. I had a funny feeling about "use Implicit"
and I wasn't sure what it w
>On the other hand, I hardly ever use $_ in main-stream programming. I
>always perform:
>for my $var ( .. ) { .. }
Certainly I seldom *mention* $_, but I sure use it a lot, as in
for (@array) { s/foo/bar/ }
It's not something I'd like made Law, but I do advise my beginning
students that
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Michael Maraist wrote:
> Good idea, but you have it backwards.. If anything, there should be an
> "explicit" keyword..
> Remember, we want
>
> % perl -p -e 's/foo/bar/g' file.txt
Oh, I know. I threw it in because someone mentioned wanting to turn it
off. (There may have
- Original Message -
From: "Perl6 RFC Librarian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 8:59 PM
Subject: RFC 2 (v3) Request For New Pragma: Implicit
> Request For New Pragma: Implicit
Good idea,
>
> I am lazy. I am spoiled by the implicit $_. I like the implicit
> $_. Implicit $_ good. Ugh. (Conversely, some people abhor the
I believe you mean "Ug." "Ug" means you are speaking pidgin, while
"Ugh" indicates disgust.
> =head1 IMPLEMENTATION
>
> The front-end would have to detect v
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Request For New Pragma: Implicit
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Bryan C. Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 5 Aug 2000
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 3
