On 15/01/2008, Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
>
> > Matisse,
> >
> > this is great work! Would it be possible for you to summarise this on
> > the parrot wiki somewhere?[1] Then we have a more permanent and
> > central location for t
On Jan 14, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
Matisse,
this is great work! Would it be possible for you to summarise this on
the parrot wiki somewhere?[1] Then we have a more permanent and
central location for the information.
Paul
[1] http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?par
On Jan 14, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
Matisse,
this is great work! Would it be possible for you to summarise this on
the parrot wiki somewhere?[1] Then we have a more permanent and
central location for the information.
Yes - I will take a whack at doing that.
Also: If anyone
Matisse,
this is great work! Would it be possible for you to summarise this on
the parrot wiki somewhere?[1] Then we have a more permanent and
central location for the information.
Paul
[1] http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?parrot
> Both passing and failing builds from buildbot s
So Andy has create a list for parrot build reports - see below.
Both passing and failing builds from buildbot should start showing up
there.
Also, the ircbot is now named eigenbot and remains on #parrot, but
you have to ask it for status info - it will not automatically
announce builds (
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:29:03PM -0500, Bob Rogers wrote:
>From: Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:20:12 -0800
>
>Where would people here want to see buildot status messages go?
>Personally, I'm not a parrot developer, so I don't have a strong
>op
From: Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:20:12 -0800
Where would people here want to see buildot status messages go?
Personally, I'm not a parrot developer, so I don't have a strong
opinion.
Maybe #parrot is enough? Really, these are pretty ephemeral.
On Jan 12, 2008, at 8:15 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
On Jan 12, 2008, at 10:12 PM, jesse wrote:
What would it take to create a separate perl.org mailing list for
buildbot status messages?
Start by dropping a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If that doesn't
get a
response, ping me.
There's no re
On Jan 12, 2008, at 10:12 PM, jesse wrote:
What would it take to create a separate perl.org mailing list for
buildbot status messages?
Start by dropping a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If that doesn't
get a
response, ping me.
There's no reason that the list needs to live at perl.org. It's
> What would it take to create a separate perl.org mailing list for
> buildbot status messages?
Start by dropping a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If that doesn't get a
response, ping me.
-j
>
> -M
>
> ---
> Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Jan 12, 2008, at 8:04 PM, jesse wrote:
At work, we actually announce all builds. passing test suites make
people feel good ;)
I'm certainly open to that.
As you might guess I am basically playing with a new toy, uh, I mean
new tool, and hoping it will be useful to the community.
I'd
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 07:52:00PM -0800, Matisse Enzer wrote:
> I am trying to see if I can get the ircbot to announce failed builds
> (only), with a URL for more info.
At work, we actually announce all builds. passing test suites make
people feel good ;)
> By the way, I am told someone did
On Jan 12, 2008, at 4:03 PM, jesse wrote:
So. the buildbot is a wonderful thing. But this list is probably the
wrong list to mail every single failed build to. Maybe a new list or
only annoucing them to irc?
Fair point.
I'll disable the email to this list for now.
I am trying to see if I
So. the buildbot is a wonderful thing. But this list is probably the
wrong list to mail every single failed build to. Maybe a new list or
only annoucing them to irc?
Best
Jesse
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:03:37PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ubuntu
14 matches
Mail list logo
