Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in time for the screamin' punkin release
You'll have to edit interpreter.h and set PARROT_CATCH_NULL to 1
to enable it.
Turned on now by default.
The patch adds the Null PMC class, only instantiated once in
system memory.
... which was the
At 12:30 PM 10/28/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll have to edit interpreter.h and set PARROT_CATCH_NULL to 1
to enable it.
Turned on now by default.
Good.
The patch adds the Null PMC class, only instantiated once in
system memory.
... which was
Yep. Seems reasonable. The macros would improve readability IMHO
As long as they don't impair debugability.
(I make a reference to perl5's macros containing macros, which do
different things based on other macros, and other fun things. It's a
fine line.)
-R
Sean O'Rourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 30 May 2003, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
Ha ha, just kidding, of course. I'm all for it, but given my record
today, that might be an imminent sign of its rejection.
Or, given your historical record, you may have just killed the thread ;).
Threads die
Mitchell N Charity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At a minimum, it would be nice for some register access macro set to
be globally available.
REG_PMC(0) = method;
Yep. Seems reasonable. The macros would improve readability IMHO
Mitchell
leo
At 5:54 PM +0200 5/31/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Mitchell N Charity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At a minimum, it would be nice for some register access macro set to
be globally available.
REG_PMC(0) = method;
Yep. Seems reasonable. The macros would improve readability IMHO
Absolutely. Works
ops2cgc.pl
register.c
trace.c
There are about 166 uses of interpreter-ctx. which are not FOO_reg.registers.
so what?
The vast majority of register accesses (~90%) are simply cut-and-pastes of 4
interpreter-ctx.FOO_reg.registers[BAR]
strings.
Register access is a high profile user
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 19:42, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
Eeep.
{snip snip}
So...
I suggest existing register access be replaced with a new macro set
#define REG_INT(x) interpreter-ctx.int_reg.registers[x]
#define REG_NUM(x) interpreter-ctx.num_reg.registers[x]
#define REG_STR(x
On 30 May 2003, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
Ha ha, just kidding, of course. I'm all for it, but given my record
today, that might be an imminent sign of its rejection.
Or, given your historical record, you may have just killed the thread ;).
/s
