David Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Satisfying Stillman might be good enough for the FSF and ODSN and GNU,
but that's quite insubstantial and superficial.
(It's Stallman; I wouldn't say anything, but I've seen that twice now.)
Note that Stallman is already satisfied with the license on
David Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then there is no point in working with licenses at all. If licenses will
not be enforced through litigation and our desires for the Perl language
cannot be enforced through public censure,
I believe that the proposed (Artistic-2.0|GPL) license is indeed
"Bradley M. Kuhn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then there is no point in working with licenses at all. If licenses
will
not be enforced through litigation and our desires for the Perl
language
cannot be enforced through public censure,
I believe that
