On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:26:28AM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > This is an average for perl5-porters over its entire existence?
> > I don't think that it's a reputation it deserves any more. It's very a
> > very uneventful list
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> > > SV> Three cheers for Dan!
>
> Do we need to stop at 3?
>
> > In fact, at face value, t
I didn't realize I was still on this list (which I'm going to take
care of in a bit) but since I'm seeing this...
At 5:07 PM -0700 6/6/05, Edward Peschko wrote:
But it still strikes me as odd. I saw some tension in the perl6
mailing lists, but
nothing that would have suggested that *this* woul
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > SV> Three cheers for Dan!
Do we need to stop at 3?
> In fact, at face value, the perl6 mailing lists seemed freshly absent from
> strife.
> They are IMO ten ti
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 Larry Wall wrote:
> I'll be glad to point out that one of the most *irritating* problems
> is people who snipe from the sidelines without having earned the
> right to do so by contributing. Dan has earned the right to carp,
> and deserves our respect for refusing to vent (muc
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > > "SV" == Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > SV> Three cheers for Dan!
> >
> > hear! hear!!
>
> I'll add a cheer as well
And I.
> Bu
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:53:03PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "SV" == Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> SV> Please honour his decision to bow out gracefully without turning it into
> SV> a childish battle of egos.
>
> SV> In the meantime let us celebrate 5 years of Dan S
> "SV" == Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SV> Please honour his decision to bow out gracefully without turning it into
SV> a childish battle of egos.
SV> In the meantime let us celebrate 5 years of Dan Sugalski's contribution
SV> to the Parrot and Perl 6 project.
SV> Three
Fagyal Csongor wrote:
With all respect, I think this is a very important thing which needs
attention, and I hope that you will help us to clarify the situation. I
am pretty sure Dan did not leave because he had a bad day - we know he
Dan's position was very stressful, he had people from all s
Larry,
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:31:01PM +0200, anonymous coward wrote:
: It's a funny old world...
: wrote Dan Sugalski on June 04, 2005 in his Squawks of the Parrot blog.
: Go and see: <http://www.sidhe.org/~dan/blog/archives/000400.html>.
:
: Hence the subject.
:
: What the he
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:31:01PM +0200, anonymous coward wrote:
: It's a funny old world...
: wrote Dan Sugalski on June 04, 2005 in his Squawks of the Parrot blog.
: Go and see: <http://www.sidhe.org/~dan/blog/archives/000400.html>.
:
: Hence the subject.
:
: What the heck is
It's a funny old world...
wrote Dan Sugalski on June 04, 2005 in his Squawks of the Parrot blog.
Go and see: <http://www.sidhe.org/~dan/blog/archives/000400.html>.
Hence the subject.
What the heck is wrong with Parrot development?
anony
12 matches
Mail list logo
