Re: Working on punie + rindolf (the implementation) Reloaded

2007-04-11 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On 4/10/07, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 02 April 2007, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 05:06:34AM +0300, Shlomi Fish < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Marc! > > > > May I forward my reply to the list? > > Yes, you may. Sorry for replying probably too late, tha

Re: Working on punie + rindolf (the implementation) Reloaded

2007-04-11 Thread Jonathan Worthington
chromatic wrote: On Tuesday 10 April 2007 18:51, Shlomi Fish wrote: (Although it seems the most interesting promises made by parrot - fast typeless code for example - are not going to be delivered, too). Hmmm I haven't been closely following Parrot. Despite this menti

Re: Working on punie + rindolf (the implementation) Reloaded

2007-04-11 Thread chromatic
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 18:51, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > (Although it seems the most interesting promises made by parrot - fast > > typeless code for example - are not going to be delivered, too). > Hmmm I haven't been closely following Parrot. Despite this mention, this thread is off-topic fo

Re: Working on punie + rindolf (the implementation) Reloaded

2007-04-11 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Monday 02 April 2007, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 05:06:34AM +0300, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Marc! > > > > May I forward my reply to the list? > > Yes, you may. Sorry for replying probably too late, thanks for asking > first! > OK. Replying to two differe