On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 12:26, Larry Wall wrote:
> Hmm, if it's getting better for you and worse for others [...] it
> might well be that they've performed a miracle.
Actually, they may well just be optimizing that work for memory, rather
than CPU, and could be making some tragic choices with respe
K Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> Thanks for your tips, all!
> I just had to be patient with the old computer. It compiles now (eventually)
And if you want fast recompiles (w/o code changes) then install ccache.
,--[ man ccache ]--
| DESCRIPTIO
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 07:02:52AM -0600, Art Haas wrote:
: Newer GCC releases are _much_ better at compiling this file than older
: releases. GCC-3.3 is better than GCC-3.2, GCC-3.4 is better than GCC-3.3,
: but best of all is GCC-3.5, as it compiles this file in usually less than
: 5 minutes and
Art Haas wrote:
Jerome Quelin wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
That'd be about three to four for the CPU you've got, and when you
throw in swapping I can see the compile time for that module hitting
15-20 minutes.
At least. FYI, I ran into the same problem some months ago. I had 128 Mb
o
Jerome Quelin wrote:
> Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> That'd be about three to four for the CPU you've got, and when you
>> throw in swapping I can see the compile time for that module hitting
>> 15-20 minutes.
>
> At least. FYI, I ran into the same problem some months ago. I had 128 Mb
> on my P4 1.3GHz
>hi,
>
>I have trouble compiling the current distribution of parrot.
>I checked it out from cvs, that didn't work, so I decided to download a
>snapshot (latest, 31/3).
>
>Compiling on my winXP computer is going ok (P3/450mhz), but while
>compiling on my linux
>server (amd k6-2/233 mhz), it hangs
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> That'd be about three to four for the CPU you've got, and when you
> throw in swapping I can see the compile time for that module hitting
> 15-20 minutes.
At least. FYI, I ran into the same problem some months ago. I had 128 Mb
on my P4 1.3GHz Linux box. The total compile ti
At 7:01 PM +0200 3/31/04, K Stol wrote:
hi,
I have trouble compiling the current distribution of parrot.
I checked it out from cvs, that didn't work, so I decided to
download a snapshot (latest, 31/3).
Compiling on my winXP computer is going ok (P3/450mhz), but while
compiling on my linux
serve
hi,
I have trouble compiling the current distribution of parrot.
I checked it out from cvs, that didn't work, so I decided to download a
snapshot (latest, 31/3).
Compiling on my winXP computer is going ok (P3/450mhz), but while
compiling on my linux
server (amd k6-2/233 mhz), it hangs on core_o
